Is There Liability For This Basketball Injury?

Posted on January 20, 2012 by T. Nelson

Plaintiff sued for personal injuries after falling during a basketball game played in his brother-in-law’s driveway. He claimed a loose stone along the perimeter of the court caused his fall. The defendant moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint. Since the plaintiff presented no evidence that the defendant created or even had notice of the defective condition on his property, the plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed.

Did you know?

In 1891 Dr. James Naismith, a physical education teacher, invented the game of basketball using a soccer ball and two peach baskets.

 

Posted in In The News This Week | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

Can Two Players Disqualify a Team From Receiving a Trophy?

Posted on December 8, 2011 by T. Nelson

Players and their coaches sued the North Carolina High School Athletic Association after they were stripped of their title in a championship. The Association determined at least two players were ineligible to play on the team since they lived outside the high school residential district. The plaintiff coaches and players argued they suffered damages from a loss of reputation and wanted the title reinstated. The Appellate Court found the only party that suffered a legally recognizable loss was the school. The plaintiffs’ case was dismissed.

Did you know?

Research shows that high school students participating in sports have a more positive relationship with their school. They tend to receive higher grades, have higher educational aspirations and have fewer disciplinary problems than those who are less active. They also have a lower dropout rate. Doing athletics has an educational value, in and of itself. The athlete learns all about teamwork, good sportsmanship, self-discipline and how to handle competitive situations. So if you’re in high school, grab that ball and get out there. For more information, check out The Case for High School Activities @ http://www.nfhs.org/content.aspx?id=3262 or Academic Value of Non-Academics: The Case for Keeping Extracurriculars @ http://www.donaldcollins.org/administrators_school_officials/ednext_20121_kronholz.pdf.

Posted in In The News This Week | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

What’s the Effect of Signing a Waiver at a Paintball Facility?

Posted on November 6, 2011 by T. Nelson

The plaintiff visited a paintball facility with her youth group in Louisville, Kentucky. Prior to playing she signed a waiver releasing the facility from any negligence. During her fourth game her mask slid off and she was hit in the eye. The plaintiff sued the facility for negligence. The facility asked the Court to summarily dismiss the plaintiff’s case. The Court did. It found that the waiver the plaintiff signed released the facility from any liability. What’s the lesson here? Prior to signing any document, it behooves you to read it thoroughly and make certain you understand its contents.

Did you know?

In September 2011, figures were released regarding the number of patients seen in emergency rooms for air and paintball injuries in 2008. In that year, 20,000 injuries were documented. Approximately 60% of the patients were 17 years old and younger. For more information visit http://www.ahrq.gov/news/nn/nn090111.htm.

Posted in In The News This Week | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

Can Lady Gaga Shut Down the LadyGaga.Org website?

Posted on October 27, 2011 by T. Nelson

No. An Arbitration Panel decided even though Lady Gaga owned the rights to the Lady Gaga trademark, she could not shut down the unofficial fan site @ http://ladygaga.org/. The Panel found, Lady Gaga “[could] not have fame without fans and fans [could] not have fan sites without referring to the objects of their admiration.” So they denied Lady Gaga’s request to shut it down. This unofficial website does disclaim, however, any association with the celebrity.

Did you know?

Trademarks protect names, symbols, logos, and images that identify the source of goods and services. These symbols can impact a consumer’s decision to purchase an item. How often have you picked up an item in a store that had a logo you were familiar with and bought it because of the company’s reputation? For more information, visit the United States Patent and Trademark Office website @ http://www.uspto.gov. There’s also a great video you can watch that explains the differences between patents, copyrights and trademarks @ http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/TMIN.jsp.

Posted in In The News This Week | Tagged , | Comments Off

Can a High School Teacher Decorate His Classroom As He Sees Fit?

Posted on September 22, 2011 by T. Nelson

Not necessarily. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals was asked to decide whether a School District infringed on a Math teacher’s First Amendment rights when they ordered him to remove two banners, each around 7 feet wide and 2 feet tall. One stated in large block letters: “IN GOD WE TRUST”; ONE NATION UNDER GOD”; GOD BLESS AMERICA”; and “GOD SHED HIS GRACE ON THEE.” The other banner read: “All men are created equal, they are endowed by their CREATOR.” Each letter of the word “CREATOR” was capitalized and almost twice the size as the other text. The teacher stated at his deposition that, “[T]his is discussing God as opposed to no God….I’m trying to highlight the religious heritage and nature of our nation, that we have that as a foundation.”

The Court found that the words conveyed a religious message and that the First Amendment did not provide a government employee with the right to perform his job any way he saw fit. It opined that the teacher speaks at school not as a private citizen, but as an employee. Citing precedent, the Court found that this teacher could espouse his views “on the sidewalks, in the parks, through the chat-rooms, at his dinner table, and in countless other locations…He may not do so, however, when he is speaking as the government, unless the government allows him to be its voice.”

Did you know?

There was an outcry to recognize God on our coins during the Civil War era. In 1864, IN GOD WE TRUST first appeared on our two-cent coins. In 1956, IN GOD WE TRUST was declared our national motto. In 1957, those same words started to appear on our paper money. To learn more, go to the U.S. Department of Treasury’s website @ http://www.treasury.gov/about/education/Pages/in-god-we-trust.aspx.

Posted in In The News This Week, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off

When Did England Establish Its Supreme Court?

Posted on September 13, 2011 by T. Nelson

In 2009.  Are you surprised?  I was.  Our Supreme Court was established in 1789, 222 years ago. 

Prior to 2009, cases in the United Kingdom were brought before judges in the House of Lords (a chamber of Parliament). Now, there are 12 justices that sit on their Supreme Court and they hear civil cases from England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland; and criminal cases from England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

It’s well worth a visit to the Court if you’re in London. However, if you have no plans to visit England in the near future, to learn more about their Court go to http://www.supremecourt.gov.uk.

Posted in In The News This Week, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

Will the Real Creator of Modern Family Please Stand Up?

Posted on August 10, 2011 by T. Nelson

Plaintiff sued alleging Modern Family, the emmy award-winning hit sitcom, was based on his copyrighted work, Looney Ben. He sued the creators, producers, distributors and broadcasters of the situation comedy for copyright infringement, idea misappropriation and defamation.  Defendants denied all the allegations. A New York federal judge has now ruled, even though there were similarities between the scripts no reasonable jury could conclude that the scripts were “substantially similar.”  Plaintiff’s claims were dismissed.

Did you know?

In 2010 the average American watched 34 hours and 39 minutes of televison per week. See http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/kids-today-how-the-class-of-2011-engages-with-media. That’s a lot of time in front of the television.  How much do you watch?

Posted in In The News This Week, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

Is a School District Liable for Spectator Injuries at a Softball Game?

Posted on June 28, 2011 by T. Nelson

Not necessarily. A mother was watching her daughter’s school softball game when she was hit in the mouth by a foul ball. She was in an unscreened area when hit. She sued the School District for negligence. The District brought a summary judgment and won. The Court found that the plaintiff assumed the risk of injury. It found that the defendant had a duty only to provide some screened seating, which it did. In addition, it found the plaintiff “had a full subjective understanding of the presence and nature of the risk of being hit by a foul ball.”

Posted in In The News This Week, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off

Can a Signed Release Relieve a Defendant From Liability?

Posted on June 28, 2011 by T. Nelson

A 16 year old soccer player fell over a sprinkler head embedded in a grassy field while playing in a tournament. She suffered extensive injuries requiring surgical reconstruction. She sued the tournament organizer and city (the owner of the fields) for negligence and premises liability. The defendants moved for summary judgment and won. A Court of Appeals in California found a Release signed by the player relieved the defendants from any liability.

Did you know?

In 1863 the first set of rules for soccer were developed in London. See http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/history/law/summary.html.

Uruguay hosted the inaugural FIFA World Cup in 1930. See http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/archive/index.html.

Posted in In The News This Week, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Does a Coach Have a Duty to Supervise Between Games?

Posted on May 18, 2011 by T. Nelson

An 11 year old volleyball player was injured at a teammate’s grandparents’ home when she was thrown from a golf cart during a break between games.  She sued her coach for negligent supervision.  The Court of Appeals of Indiana found as a matter of law that the coach owed no duty to the player during the break.  The coach released the players to their parents after the morning session and told them when to return.  Even though the coach and players ended up at an impromptu gathering, it was not a “team event” where the coach owed a duty to supervise.

Did you know?  In 1895 William G. Morgan, an instructor at a YMCA in Holyoke, Massachusetts, invented the game of volleyball.  He conceived the game by blending aspects of basketball, baseball, tennis and handball into one game.  His goal was to create a game for businessmen who found basketball too demanding.  Initially, the game was called “mintonette.”  The name was changed after someone remarked that ”volleyball” would better reflect the back and forth volleying nature of play.  See http://www.volleyball.org/history.html. 

Posted in In The News This Week, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Does a Softball Player Assume All Risks of the Game?

Posted on May 18, 2011 by T. Nelson

A New York court refused to take this issue away from a jury and conclude a junior varsity softball player injured while sliding into second base assumed the risk of her injuries.  The player had some prior experience playing softball and understood sliding was a part of the game.  However, the player testified that she was never taught how to slide, during practice never attempted to slide, no more than 5 minutes was spent discussing sliding, and she never observed anyone suffering a serious injury from sliding.  Under the circumstances, the court concluded it was a question of fact for a jury to decide whether based on the the player’s experience she was aware of and appreciated the risks of sliding.

Did you know?  Softball teams competed for the first time at the Olympic games in 1996.  However in 2005, the International Olympic Committee voted to drop softball and baseball fron the 2012 Olympic program.  Since then the Committee has also decided softball will not be included in the 2016 games.  The Intermational Baseball Federation and International Softball Federation are preparing a joint proposal to include the sports in the 2020 games.  Notably, the United States has won 3 gold medals in softball (in 1996, 2000 and 2004). 

Posted in In The News This Week, Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off

Was it Unconstitutional for President Obama to Proclaim May 6 as a National Day of Prayer?

Posted on April 24, 2011 by T. Nelson

The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit said no. On April 30, the President issued a proclamation declaring May 6, 2010, as a National Day of Prayer. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. and six of its members (“Plaintiffs) sued the President and Robert Gibbs (the former White House Press Secretary) alleging the proclamation violated the establishment clause of our Constitution (which places a “wall of separation between Church and State”). After a lower court found in favor of the Plaintiffs, the President and his Press Secretary appealed. The Appeals Court reversed the lower court’s decision opining, “[t]hose who do not agree with a President’s statement may speak in opposition to it; they are not entitled to silence the speech of which they disapprove.”

Did you know?  Congress has requested Presidents to call on their citizens to pray since the founding of our Republic. Except for Thomas Jefferson (who thought the request was inconsistent with the first amendment), all other Presidents have complied.

Posted in In The News This Week, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Should a Lab Teacher Make a Deli Run While Students Are Working Away?

Posted on April 23, 2011 by T. Nelson

A New York Appellate Court said this week, I don’t think so. Two high school students were left in a science lab while their teacher went to buy food. One student caused an explosion injuring another student (the “Plaintiff”). The Plaintiff sued for personal injuries.  The Court ruled in his favor concluding he was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The Court found the school breached its duty to exercise the level of care necessary, and that failure caused the plaintiff’s injuries.  It held the school to the “reasonably prudent parent” standard saying, since the school assumed the “physical custody and control over its students, effectively [it took] the place of parents and guardians.”

Posted in In The News This Week | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Can a Middle School Ban Its Students from Wearing the “I ❤ Boobies!” Bracelet?

Posted on April 15, 2011 by T. Nelson

Two students (a 7th and 8th grader) were suspended for part of one day and another full day at Easton Area Middle School in Pennsylvania after wearing their “I ❤ Boobies! (Keep A Breast)” bracelets to school. The bracelets were distributed by Keep A Breast Foundation as part of a national breast cancer awareness campaign. The school banned the bracelets, even though they never disrupted the  school’s learning environment. The girls and their mothers sued for a preliminary injunction enjoining the school from enforcing the ban. The Court found in their favor.  The Court stated, the word “boobies” was neither lewd nor vulgar, particularly in light of the context it was used, and could not be banned. In balancing the competing interests of school management against the protection of the students’ constitutional rights, the Court found in favor of the students’ First Amendment rights. For a look at the decision, go to http://howappealing.law.com/HvsEastonAreaSchoolDistEDPa041211.pdf. So middle school administrators, teachers, parents or students, what do you think?

Did you know?

Approximately one out of every eight women in the U.S. will develop an invasive form of breast cancer. Besides skin cancer, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer amongst women. For more statistics, go to http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/understand_bc/statistics.jsp.

Posted in In The News This Week | Tagged , | Comments Off

Should Facebook Have to Return to the Settlement Table?

Posted on April 13, 2011 by T. Nelson

On April 11, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied the Winklevoss twins (plaintiffs) their request to set aside their settlement with Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg (defendants). The plaintiffs sued the defendants claiming they stole their idea for Facebook, the social networking site. The Appeals Court found that plaintiffs, with their lawyers and financial adviser in tow (referring to the plaintiffs’ father, Howard Winkevoss, a former accounting professor at Wharton School of Business and an expert in valuation), “made a deal that appears quite favorable in light of recent market activity.” The Court concluded, ”[f]or whatever reason, [the plaintffs] now want to back out. Like the district court, we see no basis for allowing them to do so. At some point, litigation must come to an end. That point has now been reached.” If you’d like to read this decision, go to http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/04/11/08-16745.pdf. 

Did you know? There are more than 500 million active users on Facebook and 50% of them log on to Facebook on any given day. The average user has 130 friends. About 70% of Facebook users are outside the U.S. For more interesting Facebook statistics, go to http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics.

Posted in In The News This Week | Tagged , | Comments Off

Can Government Officials Terminate Employees Based on Their Political Affiliation?

Posted on April 13, 2011 by T. Nelson

Plaintiffs were maintenance and domestic workers at the governor’s mansion in Puerto Rico. After Governor Fortuno (President of the New Progressive Party) was elected, the plaintiffs (members of the Puerto Rican Popular Democratic Party) were fired. Plaintiffs sued claiming political discrimination in violation of the First Amendment. A lower court dismissed their case finding their complaint failed to state a cause of action. Plaintiffs appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit reversed the lower court’s decision. It found the First Amendment forbade government officials from firing employees based on political affiliation, unless political loyalty was an appropriate prerequisite for the job. The plaintiffs were entitled to pursue their claims.

Posted in In The News This Week | Tagged , | Comments Off

How Far Does an Employer Have to go to Accommodate an Employee’s Religious Beliefs?

Posted on April 11, 2011 by T. Nelson

A postal service employee asked to have every Saturday off because working from sundown Friday to sundown Saturday conflicted with his religious beliefs as a Seventh-Day Adventist. The United States Postal Service (USPS) said that it couldn’t accommodate his request, so the employee ultimately stopped coming to work on Saturdays.  Subsequently, the USPS fired him.  He then sued them for religious discrimination.  The USPS moved for a summary judgment which was granted. The employee appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision finding accommodating the employee’s religious beliefs couldn’t be done without undue hardship.

Did you know?

  • Mail is delivered to the bottom of the Grand Canyon on mules.
  • The Anaktuvuk Pass Post Office located in northern Alaska is the only link to the outside world for the 300 residents living there. Everything must be flown in as there are no roads to the town.
  • The Post Office that sits on the border between Tennessee and Virginia has two zip codes and serves customers in Bristol, TN and Bristol, VA.
  • The longest regular mail route is 176.5 miles in Fordsville, ND, and mail is delivered to 174 boxes there.
  • The USPS moves mail by planes, trains, trucks, cars, boats, ferries, helicopters, subways, float planes, hovercrafts, T-3s, streets, cars, mules, bicycles and feet.
  • To read more interesting facts regarding the USPS go to http://www.usps.com/communications/newsroom/postalfacts.htm.

　

Posted in In The News This Week | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Can a School System Constitutionally Require Children to be Immunized?

Posted on March 29, 2011 by T. Nelson

Plaintiffs sued various West Virginia state and county officials alleging their constitutional rights were violated. The defendants refused to enroll student, M.W., into their public school since she was not immunized for diphtheria, polio, rubeola, rubella, tetanus, and whooping cough. Notwithstanding a physician’s note recommending against the vaccination, the school would not exempt her from the immunizations. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants’ denial of a medical exemption violated their First Amendment, Equal Protection and Due Process rights. The Court disagreed. They cited the Supreme Court which has consistently recognized that states may require school children to be immunized given society’s compelling interest in fighting the spread of contagious diseases.

Did you know? In 1809 Massachusetts became the first state to enact a mandatory vaccination law against small pox. Access more information about your state’s laws at the National Vaccine Information Center. See http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/RS21414.pdf.http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx.

Posted in In The News This Week | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

Must You Lose Business to Have a Viable Tortious Interference Claim?

Posted on March 25, 2011 by T. Nelson

A New Jersey court says yes.  Advanced Oral Technologies sued Nutrex Research, the manufacturer of a bodybuilding supplement known as “Hemo Rage Black” for tortious interference.  Hemo Rage Black incorrectly listed plaintiffs’ patented “Molecule” as one of its ingredients.  Advanced Oral Technologies demanded that Nutrex remedy the situation.  Nutrex removed any reference to the “Molecule” on their website, advertising and future labels.  They also used a black marker to cross out references to the “Molecule” on any existing inventory.  However, the plaintiff was still able to locate mislabeled bottles on the market, so they sued for tortious interference, amongst other claims.  The District Court held that Advanced Oral Technologies had to identify customers or potential customers lost as a result of defendants’ conduct to have a viable claim.

Did you know?  According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, about 8,700 kids under five years old, and16,500 kids between the ages of five and fourteen, are injured by exercise equipment each year.  See http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pubs/5028.pdf.  You might want to take a look at a policy statement drafted by The American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Sports Medicine and Fitness that provides information on the risks and benefits of strength training in children and adolescents.  See http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/pediatrics;107/6/1470.pdf.

Posted in In The News This Week, Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off

Speaking of Blogs–

Posted on March 23, 2011 by T. Nelson

A Wisconsin attorney suspended from practicing law petitioned the Supreme Court of Wisconsin to reinstate his license.  The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed a memorandum against his reinstatement.  Amongst other reasons, it cited certain blog postings.  Notwithstanding OLR’s concerns, the Court ordered that the petitioner’s license be reinstated.  However, here’s another case where social media was admitted into evidence to destroy a person’s credibility.

Did you know?  According to the American Bar Association there were 1,180,386 “active” attorneys in the U.S., its territories and possessions in 2009.  Almost 45% of the top 200 grossing law firms in the U.S. have blogs.  See http: //www.lexblog.com/services/amlaw-200-firms.html.

Posted in In The News This Week | Tagged , | Comments Off